Planning Application News: Queen Edith’s Way

UPDATE: The original application here was rejected by the City Council on 29 October. However, a revised application has been submitted in December 2019 and the post has been updated to reflect that.


The house above is 140 Queen Edith’s Way. In 2015 this was massively extended by its owners from a three-bedroomed house to one containing ten bedrooms, by building on every side. It retained its status as a “Class C3” dwelling for a single household. Now, almost inevitably, comes the application to make it into a “house of multiple occupancy” (HMO) – at the same time converting the dining room into an eleventh bedroom.

The rather thin application (“Design & Access Statement”) from Neale Associates Architects requesting the change of use consists of just three pages, which bizarrely begin by describing Humberstone Road in Chesterton. The document proposes that the building will provide “11 rooms for letting purposes with a maximum occupancy of 21 people.” The smallest of the 11 rooms is just 6.34 square meters (sic), and it appears to me that three of the rooms may be below the minimum size required in the council’s residential space standards quoted by the owner. There are two kitchens and one communal living room for the occupants to share.

The (new) application proposes that “there are no changes proposed to the internal planning of the building or to the external elevations as they exist. This will provide 8 rooms for letting purposes with a maximum occupancy of 15 people.”

The original application said that “it is envisaged that prospective tenants will travel predominantly by bicycle” and only two car parking spaces are officially being provided. The new application says nothing will be changed. However, as one of the objections received from neighbours then stated, “it is ludicrous to pretend that 22 residents (or 11 households) would have only 2 cars between them.” A direct neighbour says that even now, “I am regularly woken up at night by the noise of car engines from their drive. I have found that it can take up to ten minutes for tenants to manoeuvre their cars due to the sheer number of cars parked on their drive making it difficult to vacate the property.”

An original objector points out that the 2015 extension came with a statement that “the development …shall not be separately used, occupied or let”, while another claims that the house is already being let to multiple tenants. This too is concerning. I have asked our councillor on the planning committee, Jennifer Page-Croft, to follow this up, and will report back if I get a response.

  • If you want to read the full documentation behind this application, it can be found on the City Council’s planning website here. Comments already received from neighbours can be found here.
  • If you’d like to make your own comment on the application, you can do so here. You will need to register with the site to do so. Alternatively, you can email the case officer, Brenda Louisy-Johnson, at planning@cambridge.gov.uk – you must quote reference 19/1647/FUL. Or write to: Planning Services, Cambridge City Council, PO Box 700, Cambridge CB1 0JH.

The council informs me that the Consultation Expiry Date is 9 January 2020, but I would advise commenting now, if possible.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.